Giới ngân hàng tiếp tục 'bơm tiền' vào nhiên liệu hóa thạch bất chấp thách thức khí hậu

Banks Continue Massive Investments in Fossil Fuels Despite Climate Challenges

New Report Reveals $906 Billion in Fossil Fuel Financing by World's Largest Banks in 2025

A new report released by a coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) has exposed the continuation of massive capital flows from the global banking system into the fossil fuel industry, despite increasingly stringent climate change commitments. According to the report, the world's 65 largest banks provided a total of $906 billion to the fossil fuel sector in 2025 alone, with $508 billion specifically dedicated to expansion projects.



Report Background and Context

The report was compiled by a coalition of leading environmental organizations, including the Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, Friends of the Earth US, and numerous other groups. This marks the latest in an annual series of reports tracking financial flows from financial institutions into fossil fuel projects.



The release of this report comes at a time when the world faces unprecedented climate challenges, with increasingly extreme weather events and mounting global pressure to reduce carbon emissions. Despite many countries and companies committing to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, investment in fossil fuels remains at persistently high levels.



Alarming Statistical Trends

Data from the report indicates a significant increase compared to previous years, highlighting the disconnect between public commitments and actual actions by financial institutions.



YearTotal Investment (Billions USD)Investment in Expansion Projects (Billions USD)Percentage for Expansion (%)
202374239854%
202481544555%
202590650856%

The figures demonstrate not only an increase in total investment but also a growing proportion allocated to expansion projects, directly contradicting global climate objectives.



Detailed Analysis of Investment Patterns

The report analyzed leading banks in this space, with several financial institutions standing out for their significant fossil fuel investments:



BankInvestment Amount (Billions USD)Global Market Share (%)
JPMorgan Chase98.710.9%
Citi76.58.4%
Bank of America72.38.0%
HSBC68.97.6%
Goldman Sachs65.47.2%

Of the $906 billion, approximately 45% was invested in oil and gas projects, 30% in coal, and 25% in natural gas. This indicates that oil remains the most heavily invested fossil fuel despite the gradual shift toward natural gas in many countries.



Reactions from Environmental Organizations

Environmental NGOs have responded strongly to these findings. "These numbers are not just disappointing but represent a betrayal of the banks' public climate commitments," stated a spokesperson from the Rainforest Action Network.



Many organizations are calling on investors and customers of these banks to voice their demands for genuine changes in investment policies. "Banks cannot say one thing and do another," said an environmental activist. "They must choose between short-term profits and the future of our planet."



Global Climate Commitment Context

The Paris Agreement

The 2015 Paris Agreement established the goal of limiting global temperature increase to well below 2°C, preferably 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels. To achieve this, climate scientists indicate that global carbon emissions must decrease by approximately 45% by 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2050.



To meet these targets, new investment in fossil fuels must decrease significantly, while renewable energy sources need to be accelerated. However, this report indicates the opposite trend is occurring.



Bank Commitments

Many banks on this list have announced climate commitments, including achieving carbon neutrality in their own operations, supporting customers in transitioning to a low-carbon economy, and ending financing for new coal projects.



However, the report shows these commitments are not matched by sufficiently strong action. "The continued investment in fossil fuels, particularly in expansion projects, demonstrates that these commitments are merely slogans rather than genuine pledges," noted an analyst.



Environmental Implications

The ongoing investment in fossil fuels has profound implications for the global environment. New oil and gas projects will contribute to increased carbon emissions, accelerating the pace of climate change.



According to scientific estimates, the existing fossil fuel projects in these banks' portfolios would generate enough carbon to increase global temperatures by more than 3°C compared to pre-industrial levels, far exceeding the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement.



Furthermore, fossil fuel extraction causes local environmental problems, including air, water, and soil pollution, as well as the destruction of vital ecosystems.



The Future of Banking and Fossil Fuels

Emerging Trends

Despite this report's findings of continued fossil fuel investment, there are signs of change. Some banks have begun reducing investments in coal, with some committing to end financing for new coal projects.



Additionally, demand for renewable energy is growing rapidly, with many countries aiming for 100% renewable energy by mid-century. This creates new investment opportunities for banks.



Investor Pressure

Pressure from investors is also mounting. Many large investment funds, including pension funds and institutional investors, are demanding clear emission reduction strategies from the companies they invest in.



Younger investors, who will face the long-term consequences of climate change, are increasingly concerned with ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) issues and are demanding greater transparency from financial institutions about the environmental impact of their investments.



Conclusion

This report reveals a concerning gap between public commitments and actual actions by the world's largest banks in the fight against climate change. The continued investment of hundreds of billions of dollars in fossil fuels, particularly in expansion projects, indicates a serious inconsistency.



However, there are also signs that change is underway, with increasing pressure from investors, customers, and communities. Only time will tell whether banks will genuinely transform their investment strategies to align with global climate goals.



One certainty is that in the current climate emergency, delay in transitioning away from fossil fuels is no longer an option. The future of our planet depends on immediate and decisive action from all stakeholders, including the global banking system.