The US Power Grid is Collapsing Under AI Industry Pressure

The American power grid is on the brink of failing to support the most critical industry it has ever had to serve. In reality, the dominos in this potential disaster scenario have already begun to fall. Major companies that now heavily depend on the power grid are making secret, key moves to understand what will happen next.

Tech Giants Investing Billions in Energy Independence

Microsoft recently signed a 20-year deal to restart the Three Mile Island nuclear plant, a facility that had been shut down since 2019. Amazon has spent $650 million on a data center campus to be located directly at the Susquehanna nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania. Google has partnered with Kairos Power for small modular reactors. Meta has issued requests for proposals seeking up to 4 gigawatts of new nuclear power capacity.

These are the most valuable companies on Earth, and they are committing billions of dollars and waiting years to secure energy. They are doing this not because the grid is working well. They are doing it because the grid is disintegrating. This is a story that Wall Street hasn't accounted for, and it explains why a small Canadian-listed Bitcoin mining company with infrastructure in Norway, Bitzero Holdings (NASDAQ: AIBZ), just signed a binding 15-year lease agreement worth $2.6 billion.

A Grid Built for a Different Century

The US power grid was designed for a world where electricity demand grew by 1-2% annually. That was a reliable and manageable rate, slow enough that utility companies could plan generation and transmission decades in advance with a comfortable safety margin.

That world has vanished. A single ChatGPT query consumes about 10 times the energy of a Google search. Training the next generation of large language models requires energy consumption equivalent to small cities. Industry forecasts from McKinsey now place capital spending for AI data centers at around $5.2 trillion from now through 2030. Goldman Sachs research projects global data center energy demand could increase by as much as 165% by 2030 compared to 2023 levels.

That level of demand growth is unprecedented. The grid wasn't built for it, the utilities operating the grid have no plans for it, and the regulatory framework overseeing utilities can't move fast enough to keep up.

Now, the numbers are starting to show it. The Berkeley Lab recently found that over 70% of grid interconnection requests in the US ultimately get withdrawn because the grid simply can't meet the demand. Kevin O'Leary, the Shark Tank investor and long-time infrastructure advocate, goes even further. He believes 50% of the data centers currently being planned across the United States will never be built.

The Tech Giants Have Recognized the Problem

Let's look at what the smartest people are doing. Microsoft isn't paying to restart Three Mile Island because they want to be in the nuclear business. They are doing it because the grid cannot provide the energy they need, when they need it, at any price.

Amazon isn't spending $650 million on an isotope data center out of love for nuclear chemistry. They are doing it because isotopes are the only direct way to guarantee AI power without having to wait in the utility company's queue.

Google isn't announcing a deal for small modular reactors because the technology has matured. They are doing it because the company anticipates outpacing the energy supply provided by utilities in the next decade, and doesn't trust that the grid can keep up.

And Meta isn't issuing an RFP for 4 gigawatts of new nuclear power capacity as an academic exercise. They are doing it because the company has concluded that the only way to guarantee enough energy for their AI ambitions is to build their own generation infrastructure.

These are not the moves of companies that believe the grid will be stable. These are the moves of companies that have looked at demand over the next 5-10 years and concluded that the current utility model cannot meet it. They are spending billions to circumvent it.

$12 Billion Project Halted by Local Opposition

If you want to understand how fragile the US data center pipeline has become, look at what happened in St. Joseph County, Indiana, in September 2025. A developer proposed a $12 billion data center complex that would have been the largest single investment in state history. The developer had the capital. They had identified the land. They had the backing of county economic development officials desperate for construction jobs and tax revenue.

None of that mattered. The Regional Planning Committee voted 7-0 against the project. Community members expressed concerns about water usage, electricity demand, tax impacts, and converting farmland to industrial use. Sixteen single-family homes and two family farms would have been displaced. The committee killed the project.

$12 billion in proposed investment, killed by seven local officials in a single vote. This is the new reality across the entire US data center pipeline. Even if energy is theoretically available, even if the utility company is theoretically willing, even if the project has every other piece in place, local opposition can kill it. And local opposition is rising, not falling, as communities across the country wake up to what AI data centers actually consume.

Opportunity for Companies with Existing Energy

Now let's ask the clear question. If the US grid is disintegrating, the tech giants are bypassing it, and local communities are killing new projects, who actually wins? The companies that already own AI-grade energy capacity in areas where the grid works. There aren't many such companies.

Nordic countries, particularly Norway and Finland, are the cleanest examples. Both have massive hydroelectric and nuclear generation, cold climates that reduce cooling costs, stable governments, and EU data sovereignty protections that make them ideal for AI workloads. For several years, Nordics looked like the pressure release valve for tech giants locked out of the US grid.

That window has now nearly closed. Norway has limited new data center operators to just 5 megawatts of initial allocation, which is enough to run a small Bitcoin mining operation, not an AI training cluster. Finland and Sweden are also tightening restrictions. Companies that secured significant Nordic energy capacity before the AI boom began now own something that cannot be replicated, no matter how much capital is thrown at it.

Bitzero (NASDAQ: AIBZ) is one of those companies. The company is a licensed power grid operator in Norway with direct connections to hydroelectric plants, an overall energy cost of about 3-4 cents per kilowatt-hour, and over 1 gigawatt of secured capacity across four locations in Norway, Finland, and the US.

In May 2026, Bitzero signed a binding 15-year lease with OneQode for the entire 110 megawatts at the Namsskogan, Norway location. The total contract value is approximately $2.6 billion, with implied annual revenue of $178 million when at full capacity and an 85% net operating profit margin. OneQode is deploying GPU clusters at the location for enterprise AI, large language model training, and sovereign AI workloads. The targeted commissioning is for the first half of 2027.

A Rare Stock That Owns Both Energy and Chips

What sets Bitzero apart from a pure energy play is what the company does with that energy. Two weeks before signing with OneQode, Bitzero purchased the first eight NVIDIA Blackwell B300 servers, representing 64 GPUs, to deploy at the Norway location as the company's first step into AI computing revenue. The same month, Bitzero announced a partnership with Hydra Host, a top 10 NVIDIA Cloud Partner backed by Founders Fund, that operates GPU clusters across more than 50 locations and will distribute Bitzero's computing capacity to enterprise customers globally through their Brokkr platform. Bitzero also hired CBRE, a broker that manages about $6 billion annually in data center transactions, as strategic broker for their 200 megawatt Finland location.

Most companies in the AI economy are either chip-heavy or energy-heavy. NVIDIA owns the chips. Energy producers own the electricity. Bitzero now owns low-cost secured energy, has the latest NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs deployed on that energy, has a global NVIDIA Cloud Partner distributing the resulting computing capacity, and has a $2.6 billion long-term lease with OneQode for its largest capacity block.

Peers Trading 20x Higher. Bitzero Hasn't Moved.

Add the OneQode lease revenue to Bitzero's existing Bitcoin mining operations, and the combined company would sit in the same conversation as publicly traded Bitcoin miners and AI infrastructure companies trading at billion-dollar market caps. IREN Limited (NASDAQ: IREN) trades with a market cap over $19 billion. TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: WULF) at over $14 billion. Cipher Mining (NASDAQ: CIFR) over $11 billion. Hut 8 (NASDAQ: HUT) and Core Scientific (NASDAQ: CORZ) trade at over $13 billion and $9 billion respectively. Each of these companies has built its value based on a similar proposition to what Bitzero is now executing - owned energy infrastructure plus a reliable HPC contract.

Yet Bitzero (NASDAQ: AIBZ) currently trades with a market cap of around $500 million. A company with over 1 gigawatt of secured capacity across four locations, a $2.6 billion binding 15-year lease for AI with OneQode, profitable Bitcoin mining operations, and the latest NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs deployed in Norway trades at only a fraction of IREN's market cap.

The Phoenix Group, the 10th largest publicly traded Bitcoin miner by market cap, holds a 20.8% stake in Bitzero and has a seat on the board. Kevin O'Leary is on the balance sheet. The board is expected to include former investment banking veterans from Credit Suisse and JPMorgan.

Conclusion

The US power grid is collapsing under the weight of AI demand. The tech giants know this, which is why they are restarting nuclear plants and signing 20-year contracts. Local communities are killing billion-dollar projects. Berkeley Lab data shows seven out of ten grid interconnection requests get withdrawn. And the small group of companies that secured off-grid AI energy capacity before the crisis owns an irreplaceable asset worth whatever the price.

Bitzero is one of those companies, and the OneQode deal is proof. The market hasn't adjusted to understand what that means, and the window to position before the market adjusts is closing rapidly.

By Michael Kern

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

Neither the author nor the publisher, Oilprice.com, has been compensated to publish information related to Bitzero Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIBZ). The owners of Oilprice.com own shares and/or options to purchase shares of the featured company and therefore have an incentive to see the featured company's stock perform well. The owners of Oilprice.com may buy or sell shares of the featured company at any time, including at or near the time you receive this information. This ownership should be viewed as a significant conflict with our ability to be unbiased. This is why we emphasize that you should conduct thorough due diligence as well as seek advice from a financial advisor or registered broker before investing in any securities.

This information is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Neither this information nor the Publisher does, nor claims to, provide a full analysis of any company or its financial position. The Publisher does not, and claims not to be, a registered broker or investment advisor. This information is not, and should not be construed as, personal investment advice directed to or suitable for any particular investor. Any investment should only be made after consulting with a professional investment advisor and after reviewing the company's other financial and related information. Furthermore, readers are advised to carefully read and consider the Risk Factors identified and discussed in the SEC, SEDAR and/or other governmental filings of the featured company. Investing in securities is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This information is based on information generally available to the public and does not contain any non-public, material information. The information upon which it is based is believed to be reliable. However, the Publisher cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information.